Environmental group ForestEthics recently shamed Victoria's Secret into agreeing to publish its catalog on paper that contains a certain amount of recycled or post-consumer waste. The non-profit did it by running an ad of a model sporting wings (a la Victoria's Secret models) and also carrying a chainsaw.
Good. Anything that gets companies to be more responsible about the environment is a good thing.
What took me aback, however, was that AdJab, where I read the story, said that ForestEthics is now going after L.L. Bean and Land's End.
L.L. Bean and Land's End don't use environmentally friendly paper for their catalogs?
The two companies have built their businesses on a customer base that considers itself to be nature lovers. How the heck can it be that L.L. Bean and Land's End are wasters of natural resources?
I feel as though one of my heroes has been exposed as a fraud. Having lived in New England for many years, I consider L.L. Bean the gold standard when it comes to functional clothing that will keep me warm and dry without bankrupting me. You'll get my 16-year-old L.L. Bean Maine Hunting Boots when you pry them from my cold, dead hands. (No, I don't hunt, don't own a gun, and am not a member of the NRA; I just really love these boots.)
Anyway, learning that L.L. Bean is not doing its part to protect the environment really bothers me as a consumer. That's why, as a marketing geek, I think L.L. Bean should change its paper policy before ForestEthics makes a public issue out of it.